Oxford dons break cover and join fight against lab
Oxford dons have united for the first time to oppose Oxford’s plan for an animal-testing lab. But Pro-Test, the most vocal supporters of the South Parks Road lab, have denounced the group as nothing more than “a front” and “a way to get some media attention”. Voice for Ethical Research at Oxford, known as VERO, was founded by Oxford graduate Sharon Howe, who publicly returned her Oxford MA to the University in March 2006 in protest against the lab.
After her stand, and the subsequent media coverage, Howe received correspondence from members of the University, which prompted her to found the group. Howe commended the former and current members of the University who signed an open letter to Vice Chancellor John Hood, blasting him for providing financial support for a process which “subjects animals to considerable pain, stress and lasting harm”.
She said, “It’s quite a brave thing for them to do, because you could be seen as disloyal to the University, if you’re employed or are a student there now it’s quite difficult. It’s much easier for people like me who were there in the past. Our careers don’t depend on it and we’re not going to be seen as disloyal. “Lots of people don’t want to raise their heads above the parapet, it’s quite a difficult thing to do.
Katherine Morris, a Philosophy fellow at Mansfield College and one of 21 founder members of VERO, agreed that it was hard for members of the University to criticise the lab. “It’s difficult to assess, but I think a number of people might feel nervous voicing opposition to the lab, since the University as an institution declares itself in favour of it.
Pro-Test have criticised the group for failing to gain support from serious scientific opinion, pointing out that the group is made up of academics with arts qualifications. Spokesman Iain Simpson said, “The members of VERO are entitled to their opinions but I find it interesting that to the best of my knowledge they don’t have a single scientist among them.
VERO accuses Pro-Test of posting the names of members of the group online, along with derogatory comments, an allegation which Pro-Test vigorously denies. Katherine Morris said, “Part of the problem is that Pro-Test suggests unless you are in favour a pro-lab stance you’re against academic freedom, and in favour of the tactics of extremism.” She denounced the acts of animal rights extremists, saying “We’re not nutters that firebomb things.”
4th Oct 2006